United States v. Smith
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
551 F.2d 348 (1976)

- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
Tyrone Smith (defendant) and Anthony Gartrell (defendant) were charged with armed bank robbery. Gartrell had a prior criminal conviction for attempted robbery. The district-court judge ruled that if Gartrell chose to testify, his prior conviction could be used for impeachment purposes. This meant that the government (plaintiff) could use the prior conviction to challenge Gartrell’s credibility. Gartrell did not testify. Subsequently, the jury convicted Smith and Gartrell. Gartrell appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McGowan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.