United States v. Stadium Apartments, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
425 F.2d 358 (1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 926, 91 S.Ct. 187, 27 L.Ed.2d 185 (1970)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Stadium Apartments, Inc. (Stadium) (defendant) owned a property subject to a mortgage held by Prudential Insurance Co. (Prudential) and insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) (plaintiff). Prudential assigned the mortgage to FHA when Stadium defaulted. FHA paid Prudential in full and commenced foreclosure proceedings. The district court entered a judgment for FHA, while allowing Stadium a one-year redemption period pursuant to Idaho statute. FHA appealed, claiming that as a federal agency it was not subject to state redemption statutes.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Duniway, J.)
Dissent (Ely, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.