United States v. Starrett City Associates
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
840 F.2d 1096 (1988)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Starrett City Associates (Starrett) (defendant) operates a housing development in Brooklyn where it maintained a set racial distribution by apartment. Starrett sought a racial composition of about 64% white, 22% black, and 8% Hispanic residents in its complex at all times. In order to do this, Starrett kept a pool of applicants sorted by race and when a tenant moved out, Starrett chose an applicant the same race as the departing tenant to take over. A group of black applicants brought suit alleging racial discrimination. The parties reached a settlement under which Starrett would allocate additional units to minority applicants for five years. The federal government then commenced an action against Starrett in order to have a court make a determination on the legality of Starrett’s quota policy. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ruled against Starrett. Starrett appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Miner, J.)
Dissent (Newman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 780,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.