United States v. Stewart-Carrasquillo

997 F.3d 408 (2021)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Stewart-Carrasquillo

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
997 F.3d 408 (2021)

Facts

James Stewart-Carrasquillo and Harold Esquilin-Montañez (defendants) were arrested off the coast of Puerto Rico on a fishing boat that had 25 bales of cocaine on the deck in plain view. At trial, James and Harold claimed that James’s uncle, Juan Carrasquillo-Soto, had invited them on a fishing trip and that they came upon the packages while out at sea. They further claimed that Juan had picked the packages out of the water and loaded them onto the boat by himself because they refused to help. To challenge James’s and Harold’s version of events, the government questioned Juan’s physical ability to bring the bales onboard given his age. In response, James and Harold offered a homemade reenactment video that showed a woman of Juan’s age bringing 25 bales aboard a vessel by herself. The defense counsel argued that the video would help the jury understand James’s and Harold’s testimony. The government objected to the video, arguing that it should be excluded because the differences between the video and the actual events rendered the video prejudicial. For example, the boat and the sea conditions were different, and the boat was just off a pier during the daytime rather than out at sea at dawn. Additionally, a captain was clearly visible while the woman loaded the bales, although James’s and Harold’s testimony suggested the boat was drifting without a captain for the approximately 40 minutes Juan was busy loading bales. The district judge concluded that the video’s risk of prejudice substantially outweighed its probative value and thus excluded the video under Federal Rule of Evidence 403. After James and Harold were subsequently convicted, they appealed, arguing that the video should have been admitted.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Katzmann, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 911,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 911,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 997 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 911,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 997 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership