United States v. Still

850 F.2d 607 (1988)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Still

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
850 F.2d 607 (1988)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Someone saw Reginald Still (defendant) putting on a long blonde wig while sitting in a van with the motor running about 200 feet away from a bank. The witness called the police, who arrested Still shortly afterward. Still told police, “You did a good job. You arrested me five minutes before I was going to rob a bank. That’s what I was putting the wig on for.” Still said he planned to drive up to the bank’s drive-up window and put a fake bomb and a demand note on the sill. Still did not identify the bank by name, but he gave an accurate description of the building. Still announced that, even without his statements, all the evidence police needed was in the van, which Still stated was stolen. Police found a fake bomb, a bag with a demand note taped to it, a blonde wig, a police scanner tuned to the local police department, and some draft demand notes in the van. Still was convicted of attempted bank robbery and appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brunetti, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership