United States v. Strohm

671 F.3d 1173 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Strohm

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
671 F.3d 1173 (2011)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Susie Strohm (defendant) was a suspended ClearOne Communications Inc. (ClearOne) executive. The Securities and Exchange Commission sought a preliminary injunction against ClearOne based on accounting irregularities. At the hearing, Strohm denied involvement in a particular sale and, when asked to approximate when she first learned of the sale, testified she did not know if it was before or after ClearOne’s fiscal year-end. The evidence established that the sale was finalized one day before the end of ClearOne’s fiscal year and that when Strohm realized she had miscalculated whether ClearOne would meet revenue projections, she increased the price of the product. Strohm was charged with perjury based on her testimony. Strohm was convicted and argued on appeal that the question about her involvement in the sale was fundamentally or arguably ambiguous, she gave literally true answers, and her testimony was not material to the district court’s decision.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tymkovich, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership