United States v. Tavares
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
844 F.3d 46 (2016)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Elizabeth Tavares, John O’Brien, and William Burke (defendants) were tried in federal district court for mail fraud and violations of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. During trial, the district court told jurors that they could submit questions for the court to ask witnesses based on whether “the lawyer gets out what interests you from the witness.” The jurors submitted 281 questions, and the court asked witnesses 180 of those questions. Many of the jurors’ questions went beyond seeking clarifications of the witnesses’ testimony and requested additional gap-filling evidence. Tavares, O’Brien, and Burke were convicted, and they appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Torruella, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.

