From our private database of 32,200+ case briefs...
United States v. Tenacious Holdings, Inc.
United States Court of International Trade
6 F. Supp. 3d 1374 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2014)
The United States government (plaintiff) brought suit against Tenacious Holdings, Inc. (Tenacious) (defendant) in the United States Court of International Trade for negligent misclassification of work gloves. The government sought $50,000 in penalties. On the date its discovery requests were due, Tenacious filed a motion for referral to court-annexed mediation. Tenacious argued that litigation costs would exceed the penalty due and that the classification at issue expired, rendering a court opinion on the issue with no precedential value. The government argued the motion should not be granted before Tenacious responded to the discovery requests.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Carman, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 585,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 585,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.