United States v. Thompson
United States District Court for the District of Nevada
538 F. Supp. 3d 1122 (2021)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Michael Thompson (defendant) was charged with assaulting his wife, D.C., while on a camping trip with D.C.’s grandchildren. The prosecution claimed, based on D.C.’s version of events, that Thompson assaulted D.C. after she chastised him for a comment about D.C.’s granddaughter. However, Thompson argued that D.C.’s wounds were self-inflicted and related to her drug use. The prosecution moved to limit Thompson’s cross-examination of D.C. by restricting questions about D.C.’s drug use to the day of the incident and preventing any questions about D.C.’s history of depression or self-harm. The government argued that broader questions about drug use, depression, or self-harm would be improper under Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 608(b) because they would seek to prejudice D.C. and impeach her credibility regarding the incident based on specific past events. Thompson countered that questions about D.C.’s drug use, depression, and self-harm were relevant to her credibility and necessary to impeach her testimony regarding the incident. The district court considered the parties’ arguments.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dorsey, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 911,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 997 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

