United States v. Thompson

538 F. Supp. 3d 1122 (2021)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Thompson

United States District Court for the District of Nevada
538 F. Supp. 3d 1122 (2021)

Facts

Michael Thompson (defendant) was charged with assaulting his wife, D.C., while on a camping trip with D.C.’s grandchildren. The prosecution claimed, based on D.C.’s version of events, that Thompson assaulted D.C. after she chastised him for a comment about D.C.’s granddaughter. However, Thompson argued that D.C.’s wounds were self-inflicted and related to her drug use. The prosecution moved to limit Thompson’s cross-examination of D.C. by restricting questions about D.C.’s drug use to the day of the incident and preventing any questions about D.C.’s history of depression or self-harm. The government argued that broader questions about drug use, depression, or self-harm would be improper under Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 608(b) because they would seek to prejudice D.C. and impeach her credibility regarding the incident based on specific past events. Thompson countered that questions about D.C.’s drug use, depression, and self-harm were relevant to her credibility and necessary to impeach her testimony regarding the incident. The district court considered the parties’ arguments.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dorsey, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 911,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 911,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 997 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 911,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 997 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership