United States v. Tittel

53 M.J. 313 (2000)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Tittel

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
53 M.J. 313 (2000)

Facts

Specialist Third Class Todd A. Tittel (defendant) was tried by general court-martial and convicted of shoplifting from the Navy Exchange in Sasebo, Japan. Four months later, Tittel was caught shoplifting from the Navy Exchange in Yokosuka, Japan. This incident prompted Captain William D. Lynch, Commanding Officer Fleet Activities, Yokosuka, Japan, to ban Tittel from all Navy Exchange facilities. After Tittel disobeyed Lynch’s order and again entered a Navy Exchange, he was tried by a special court-martial and convicted of willful disobedience of a superior officer and larceny. The court martial sentenced Tittel to 103 days’ confinement, forfeiture of pay, a reduction in pay grade, and a bad-conduct discharge from the Navy. Lynch, the convening authority, approved the sentence. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the conviction, and Tittel appealed. On appeal, Tittel argued that Lynch had been the victim of Tittel’s willful disobedience, which rendered him unable to be neutral with regard to Tittel’s case and thus disqualified him as the convening authority for Tittel’s court-martial.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cox, J.)

Concurrence (Effron, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership