United States v. Ulbricht

31 F. Supp. 3d 540 (2014)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Ulbricht

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
31 F. Supp. 3d 540 (2014)

Facts

The United States indicted Ross Ulbricht (defendant) for, among other things, participating in a money-laundering conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956. The charges against Ulbricht arose from Ulbricht’s design, launch, and administration of a website called the Silk Road, which allegedly served as a marketplace for contraband goods and services. Ulbricht allegedly made Silk Road a facilitator of illegal transactions by making the site available only via Tor (software and a network that anonymized internet activity) and by requiring that all transactions be paid for with Bitcoin (an anonymous and untraceable digital currency). Ulbricht moved to dismiss the money-laundering count, arguing that § 1956 applied only to financial transactions involving monetary instruments. Relying on pronouncements by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) regarding Bitcoin, Ulbricht claimed that transactions using Bitcoin—the Silk Road’s exclusive payment method—did not involve monetary instruments and thus were not within § 1956’s ambit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Forrest, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership