United States v. Ulbricht
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
31 F. Supp. 3d 540 (2014)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
The United States indicted Ross Ulbricht (defendant) for, among other things, participating in a money-laundering conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956. The charges against Ulbricht arose from Ulbricht’s design, launch, and administration of a website called the Silk Road, which allegedly served as a marketplace for contraband goods and services. Ulbricht allegedly made Silk Road a facilitator of illegal transactions by making the site available only via Tor (software and a network that anonymized internet activity) and by requiring that all transactions be paid for with Bitcoin (an anonymous and untraceable digital currency). Ulbricht moved to dismiss the money-laundering count, arguing that § 1956 applied only to financial transactions involving monetary instruments. Relying on pronouncements by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) regarding Bitcoin, Ulbricht claimed that transactions using Bitcoin—the Silk Road’s exclusive payment method—did not involve monetary instruments and thus were not within § 1956’s ambit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Forrest, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.