United States v. Undetermined Quantities of an Article of Device … “Depilatron Epilator”
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
473 F. Supp. 913 (1979)

- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
The United States brought an in rem proceeding under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for forfeiture and condemnation of a depilatory device. The owner of the device moved to dismiss, arguing that the act’s Medical Device Amendments of 1976 were unconstitutional because they allowed seizure of medical devices without proof of interstate commerce.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sand, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 965,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.


