United States v. Veach
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
455 F.3d 628 (2006)
Darwin Veach (defendant) was in a car accident while driving intoxicated in a national park. Two park rangers, Greg Mullin and Karen Bradford, arrived and prepared to take Veach into custody. Veach resisted, pulling away from Mullin and causing her to scrape her knee on the ground. In the car, Veach repeatedly threatened to kill Mullin and Bradford by shooting them or decapitating them. His conduct led to his conviction for one count of resisting a federal officer and two counts of threatening to assault and murder a federal officer with the intent to interfere with the officer’s enforcement of his duties. Veach appeals, arguing that the trial court should have allowed him to present a defense of voluntary intoxication.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Daughtrey, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.