From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez
United States Supreme Court
494 U.S. 259 (1990)
Rene Martin Verdugo-Urquidez (defendant), a Mexican citizen and resident, was arrested by United States (plaintiff) law enforcement and charged with narcotics offenses. After the arrest, a federal agent received authorization from Mexican authorities to search two homes of Verdugo-Urquidez in Mexico. No warrant was procured. Verdugo-Urquidez sought to suppress evidence that was seized in the search. A federal district judge granted his motion on the ground that the search and seizure violated the Fourth Amendment. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed. The United States petitioned the Supreme Court for certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)
Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)
Concurrence (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.