United States v. Wall
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
92 F.3d 1444 (1996)
- Written by Brett Stavin, JD
Facts
Nathan and Donald Wall (defendants) were charged by the federal government (plaintiff) with operating an illegal gambling business in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1955. The Walls pleaded guilty while reserving the right to challenge the constitutionality of § 1955. On appeal, the Walls argued that Congress exceeded its authority under the Commerce Clause in enacting § 1955. The Walls recognized that the federal courts had previously upheld the constitutionality of § 1955, but they argued that the Supreme Court’s intervening decision in United States v. Lopez established a more restrictive interpretation of the Commerce Clause, under which § 1955 could no longer pass muster.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Siler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.


