Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 19,800+ case briefs...

United States v. Washington

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
498 F.3d 225 (2007)


Facts

Dwonne Washington (defendant) was convicted of driving while under the influence of alcohol and drugs. During Washington’s trial, the government presented expert testimony from Dr. Barry Levine, who testified that Washington’s erratic driving on the night of his arrest was due to phencyclidine (PCP) and alcohol in his blood. Washington objected to Dr. Levine’s testimony as hearsay of the lab technician’s statements. The court overruled Washington’s objection and admitted the testimony. Washington appealed his conviction on the basis that Dr. Levine’s testimony was inadmissible hearsay.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Niemeyer, J.)

Dissent (Michael, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 509,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 509,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 19,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial