United States v. Willoughby Camera Stores, Inc.
United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
21 C.C.P.A. 322 (1933)
- Written by Gonzalo Rodriguez, JD
Facts
Willoughby Camera Stores, Inc. (Willoughby) (plaintiff) imported wooden camera tripods. The United States Customs Service (customs) (defendant) classified the tripods under paragraph 1551 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as parts of cameras. Willoughby challenged the classification, arguing that the tripods should have been classified under paragraph 412 as manufactures of wood not specifically provided for. According to witness testimony, large cameras could not function without support, and so the tripods were necessary for cameras to function. Tripods, however, were sold separately from cameras. The United States Customs Court held that customs properly categorized the tripods as parts of cameras because the tripods were necessary to the functioning of the cameras. Willoughby appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hatfield, J.)
Concurrence (Lenroot, J.)
Concurrence (Bland, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.