United States v. Wilson

532 F.2d 641 (1976)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Wilson

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
532 F.2d 641 (1976)

KL

Facts

Boyd Gray, Isreal Wilson, and Brenda Brown (the conspirators) (defendants) were convicted of conspiracy to distribute heroin. An informant, Henderson McCoy, testified at trial that he purchased heroin from and sold heroin for the conspirators. McCoy testified that the conspirators ran the drug operation from an apartment and that the apartment had a hole cut out of the door so that money and heroin could be exchanged without opening the door. McCoy testified that drug transactions were recorded by the conspirators in a notebook. When police searched the apartment, they noted the hole in the door consistent with McCoy’s description and an unindicted coconspirator was inside the apartment. Police also found two notebooks in the bedroom. The notebooks described transactions for the sale of heroin and mentioned several of the conspirators. During the trial, the district court judge permitted the two notebooks to be admitted into evidence and read to the jury. The conspirators did not introduce any evidence pertaining to the notebooks. The conspirators were convicted, and they appealed, arguing that the notebooks were not authenticated, because the author of the notebooks was not identified.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lay, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership