United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
513 U.S. 64 (1994)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Rubin Gottesman owned and operated X-Citement Video, Inc. (defendant), a pornography retailer. The news had recently reported that Traci Lords had been repeatedly filmed performing pornographic acts before she turned 18 years of age. An undercover police officer asked Gottesman for videos starring Traci Lords. Gottesman sold the police officer several dozen films that showed Lords engaging in pornographic acts while she was a minor. Gottesman was charged with distributing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252, which is part of the Protection of Children Against Sexual Exploitation Act (the act). At trial, evidence showed that Gottesman knew that Lords was a minor at the time the videos were filmed. Gottesman was convicted. On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the act was unconstitutional on its face. The Ninth Circuit recognized that the First Amendment protected the right to distribute adult pornography, which meant pornography distribution could be prohibited only if the distributor knew the material contained a minor. The Ninth Circuit held that under the act’s most natural reading, the act did not require knowledge that a minor was in the film. Rather, someone could violate the act by knowingly distributing a video even if the person did not know that the video contained pornographic material or that anyone in the film was a minor. Applying this natural interpretation, the Ninth Circuit struck down the act for violating the First Amendment and vacated Gottesman’s conviction. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)
Concurrence (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 819,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.