United States v. Youts

229 F.3d 1312 (2000)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Youts

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
229 F.3d 1312 (2000)

Play video

Facts

Abner Youts (defendant) and Richard Nesbitt drank alcohol for many hours before walking home one evening. Youts and Nesbitt came upon a rail yard where the pair boarded two idling locomotives. Youts decided to drive the train home and stopped the train one block from his house. Before disembarking, Youts set the train in reverse at full throttle. As the train sped toward the rail yard, it derailed and caused substantial damage. The United States (plaintiff) charged Youts and Nesbitt with wrecking a train in violation of federal law. Nesbitt pled guilty and agreed to testify against Youts. A jury convicted Youts. The jury sentenced Youts to 46 months of imprisonment and ordered him to pay over $230,000 in restitution. Youts appealed, arguing that the evidence presented failed to show that he had the specific intent to commit the offense.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Seymour, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership