University Health Services, Inc. v. Piazzi

1986 WL 1167470 (1986)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

University Health Services, Inc. v. Piazzi

Georgia Superior Court
1986 WL 1167470 (1986)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

Donna Piazzi was approximately 20 weeks pregnant and in an unconscious state when she was admitted to a hospital operated by University Health Services, Inc. (UHS) (plaintiff). Donna was pronounced brain-dead and put on life support. While Donna was on life support, the fetus reached the quickening stage. It was determined that in order for the fetus to survive, life support needed to be maintained. Donna’s husband, Robert Piazzi (defendant) requested that UHS terminate Donna’s life support, which would result in death to the fetus. UHS then filed a petition for a declaratory judgment that Donna’s life support should be maintained so that the fetus could continue to develop and eventually survive outside Donna’s womb. David Hadden, who claimed to be the father of the fetus, supported UHS’s request. A guardian ad litem appointed by the court also supported UHS’s request. The Division of Family and Children Services (DFCS) filed a motion to dismiss the case, arguing that the decision of whether life support must be maintained to protect an unborn fetus is beyond the court’s jurisdiction.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fleming, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership