XAE Corp. v. SMR Property Management Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1998 OK 51, 968 P.2d 1201, 141 O. & G.R. 557 (1998)
![SC](https://quimbee-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/educator/photo/11/Sean_Carroll.webp)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The predecessor in interest to SMR Property Management Company (SMR) (defendant) assigned to XAE Corporation (XAE) (plaintiff) an overriding royalty interest on gas produced under an oil and gas lease. The assignment did not contain an explicit requirement for SMR to market the gas. SMR deducted, from its royalty payments to XAE, all costs of gathering, processing, and delivering the gas. XAE brought suit against SMR to recover these deductions. XAE claimed that it was entitled to royalties on the gas produced at the well, and that SMR was required to pay for making the gas marketable. The trial court granted XAE summary judgment, finding that SMR had a duty to make the gas marketable. The Supreme Court of Oklahoma granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hargrave, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.