Yale Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission

478 F.2d 594 (1973)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Yale Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
478 F.2d 594 (1973)

Facts

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (defendant) issued a notice and order regarding drug-oriented music allegedly played by some radio stations to remind broadcasters of their preexisting duty to have knowledge of the content of their programming and, based on that knowledge, to evaluate the desirability of broadcasting music dealing with drug use. The FCC explained that a broadcaster could fulfill its obligation through (1) pre-screening by a responsible station employee; (2) monitoring selections while they were being played; or (3) considering and responding to the public’s complaints. The order made it clear that these procedures were merely suggestions and that they were not to be considered as either absolute requirements or the exclusive means by which a broadcaster could fulfill its station’s public-interest obligation. Yale Broadcasting Company (YBC) (plaintiff) challenged the notice and order as an unconstitutional infringement on its First Amendment right to free speech.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wilkey, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 829,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership