Yarbro v. Neil B. McGinnis Equip. Co.
Supreme Court of Arizona
101 Ariz. 378 (1966)
- Written by Megan Schwarz, JD
Facts
Beuford Yarbro (defendant) had sought to purchase a tractor from the McGinnis Equipment Co. (plaintiff), and McGinnis denied financing Yarbro because of Yarbro’s unacceptable credit. Yarbro convinced Russell to buy the tractor instead and Russell entered a 23-month installment contract with McGinnis for the tractor. After Russell failed to pay several monthly installments to McGinnis, Yarbro agreed to help pay the deficiency of Russell’s account. After a couple returned checks for insufficient funds, McGinnis attempted to repossess the tractor. Yarbro promised to pay the amount owed on the tractor if McGinnis did not repossess the tractor. After another failed payment, McGinnis repossessed the tractor and brought action to recover payments due under the sales contract. A default judgment was entered against Russell, and the trial court found Yarbro liable for the entire $8,751.95 balance under the contract. The case is on appeal from the trial court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bernstein, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.