Yesh Din v. Israel Defense Forces Commander in the West Bank

HCJ 2164/09 (2011)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Yesh Din v. Israel Defense Forces Commander in the West Bank

Israel Supreme Court
HCJ 2164/09 (2011)

Facts

In the late 1960s, the Israeli military began occupying what became known as the occupied Palestinian territories, an area that included the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. In the 1970s, after Israeli military administration of the area was established, Israel engaged in various commercial activities, including mining quarries in the West Bank. In 2009, the Palestinian territories remained occupied, and the Israeli military administration was still mining. The Yesh Din Association (Yesh Din) (plaintiff), an association promoting human rights, filed a petition against the Israel Defense Forces commander in the West Bank (IDF commander) (defendant), seeking an order mandating the cessation of all quarrying operations by Israeli-owned quarries in the occupied area. Yesh Din argued that the mining violated Article 55 of the Hague Convention Respecting Laws and Customs of War on Land because mining minerals necessarily damaged the capital of the occupied territory. The IDF commander argued that reasonable usage of minerals in an occupied territory was permissible. He also argued that such usage was particularly appropriate in the Palestinian territories given the occupation’s lengthy duration and the fact that the quarries employed local Palestinians and generated funds used by the military administration to benefit the occupied area. The Supreme Court of Israel considered the parties’ arguments.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Beinish, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 918,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 918,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 918,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 1,000 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership