Zadvydas v. Davis
United States Supreme Court
533 U.S. 678, 121 S.Ct. 2491, 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001)
Zadvydas and Kim Ho Ma (plaintiffs) were both ordered removed but remained in government custody after the initial 90-day removal period. Zadvydas, a resident alien, was convicted of multiple crimes and ordered removed. However, no country would accept him and he remained in custody. Ma was a resident alien convicted of manslaughter and ordered removed after serving two years in jail. The INS continued to keep him after the removal period because it believed Ma would not remain nonviolent and comply with the conditions of his release. Zadvydas and Ma both sought a writ of habeas corpus and the Supreme Court granted certiorari and consolidated the appeals.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)
Dissent (Scalia, J.)
Dissent (Kennedy, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.