Zeffiro v. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co.

623 F.2d 290 (1980)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Zeffiro v. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
623 F.2d 290 (1980)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Jay A. Zeffiro and Harry M. Barnard, Jr. (collectively, the debenture holders) (plaintiffs) held debentures issued by Capital Equipment Leasing Corporation (Capital). The debentures were issued by Capital under an indenture that appointed First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co. (First Pennsylvania) (defendant) as the indenture trustee. Capital defaulted on the debentures and filed for bankruptcy. The debenture holders filed a lawsuit against First Pennsylvania in federal district court, alleging that First Pennsylvania violated the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 by breaching indenture terms required by the act. First Pennsylvania moved to dismiss the case, arguing that the Trust Indenture Act did not create a federal cause of action against an indenture trustee for violating an indenture. Instead, First Pennsylvania reasoned that claims brought under an indenture were contractual claims governed by state law. The district court held that the debenture holders had a federal cause of action under the Trust Indenture Act. First Pennsylvania appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rosenn, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership