Zinnel v. Berghuis Construction Co.
Minnesota Supreme Court
274 N.W.2d 495 (1979)
- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
The Zinnel family was involved in a two-car accident on a highway bypass that was under construction. Mrs. Zinnel died, and Mr. Zinnel and two of his children were injured in the accident. Mr. Zinnel (plaintiff) sued Berghuis Construction Company and the Minnesota Valley Improvement Company (MVIC) (defendants) for their alleged negligence in the signing, striping, and barricading of the highway construction project. Albert M. Teigum, the driver of the second car and the third-party defendant, also died in the accident. At trial, there was minimal evidence of how the accident happened, and there were no eyewitnesses. The evidence equally supported two or more inconsistent inferences as to what caused the accident. The trial court granted Berghuis and MVIC’s motion for directed verdict because there was insufficient evidence that the alleged negligence of Berghuis and MVIC proximately caused the accident. Zinnel appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Peterson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.