Zito v. Steeplechase Films

267 F. Supp. 2d. 1022 (2003)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Zito v. Steeplechase Films

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
267 F. Supp. 2d. 1022 (2003)

Facts

Tom Zito (plaintiff) took a photograph of Ansel Adams in front of Half Dome in Yosemite National Park, and Zito owned the copyright in the photograph. Steeplechase Films (Steeplechase) (defendant) used the photograph in a documentary film about Ansel Adams without giving artistic credit to Zito. Zito sued Steeplechase in federal district court for reverse passing off and other claims. The reverse-passing-off claim alleged that Steeplechase had violated Zito’s rights under § 43(a) of the federal Lanham Act by failing to give Zito artistic credit for the photograph. Steeplechase moved to dismiss the claim, arguing that it was not a valid claim as a matter of law. The district court considered the motion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Whyte, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 918,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 918,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 918,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 1,000 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership