Host posted a
flyer on the bulletin board of a local music school, stating that he was
hosting an event next month, for which he planned to hire a DJ. The flyer invited
interested students to contact him with their hourly rates and three past
clients whom Host could contact for references. The flyer also gave a local
mailing address for this purpose.
one night, Student happened to notice the billboard. She immediately wrote to
Host indicating that she was available on the date in question, and that her
hourly rate was $150. She also listed the names and contact information of
three prior clients. Three days later, Host wrote back to Student, stating that
her references had all given excellent reviews, and asking whether Student would
be willing to work for $100 per hour if he advertised her services in the
program provided for the event. Student received the letter the day after Host
sent it, and wrote back the next day that she would be willing to drop her rate
to $125 per hour plus the advertisement, but no lower.
Four days later,
having received no response, Student called Host on the telephone to say that, because
the event was only about two weeks away, she had assumed that Host had decided
to use another DJ. For that reason, Student had booked another client for the
same day and time as Host’s event. Host said, “No, I sent you a letter
yesterday accepting your terms—you haven’t received it yet? We have a contract,
and I will expect you to perform at my event!” (Assume that Host really sent
the letter when he said he did, and that he can prove it in court.) Later that
day, Host’s letter arrived in Student’s afternoon mail.
Host has filed a
breach of contract claim against Student, and asked the court to order Student
to perform at his event. Assume that, if the court does not so order, Host can and
will hire a replacement DJ, but only at a higher cost. Also assume that (1) all
mailings were done properly, and (2) the common law of contracts, and not
Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, applies.
that she and Host are not in a binding contract, because Host waited too long
to respond to her, and she withdrew her offer before Host accepted it.
Is Student’s argument correct? Explain, analyzing only the offer-and-acceptance issue, and not whether Student has breached or repudiated any contract.
Assuming that Student is in breach, having repudiated a valid and binding contract with Host, is the court likely to issue an order compelling Student to perform at Host’s event? If not, what will the court do instead? Explain.