Adoption of Ilona
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
944 N.E.2d 115 (2011)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
A juvenile court judge terminated Ilona’s biological parents’ rights and approved adoption by her foster parents. Because Ilona had a significant attachment to her mother, the judge found that continued contact with her would be in Ilona’s best interest. The judge also found that Ilona’s preadoptive foster mother was “very warm and nurturing,” and that she would continue to support contact between Ilona and her biological mother as in Ilona’s best interest unless it began to harm Ilona. Therefore, instead of entering an order specifying the frequency or extent of visitation, the judge concluded that those decisions were “best left to the informed decision making” of Ilona’s foster parents. Ilona’s biological mother appealed. The appellate court affirmed the termination of parental rights but found that the trial court should have entered an order setting specific visitation instead of leaving it to Ilona’s preadoptive parents’ discretion. Both sides appealed to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gants, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.