American Cyanamid Company v. Capuano
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
381 F.3d 6 (2004)
- Written by Abby Keenan, JD
Facts
The Capuano family (defendants) had a waste-hauling business. They contracted with the owner of a pig farm for exclusive rights to dispose of waste there. During this arrangement, the Capuanos selected a location for dumping, hired workers to clear trees and dig a hole, directed trucks carrying waste to the site, and arranged a payment system for the deliveries. The waste disposal contaminated the groundwater. The United States sought reimbursement for cleanup costs under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) from multiple parties who either owned or operated the site, transported waste to the site, arranged to have their waste transported there, or produced waste there. Several parties settled, including American Cyanamid Company (plaintiff). These companies then filed a contribution action in federal district court against multiple defendants, including the Capuanos, to recover cleanup costs. The district court found the Capuanos liable under CERCLA, and the Capuanos appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Torruella, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.