Appeal of Peterson
New Hampshire Supreme Court
126 N.H. 605, 495 A.2d 1266 (1985)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
Kenneth Peterson (plaintiff) was injured in the course of his employment at a state-run hospital in New Hampshire. Peterson received workers’-compensation benefits but after recovering from surgery was still unable to return to his job, and the hospital had no positions available that Peterson could perform. Peterson agreed to resign and accepted a lump-sum payment in lieu of continued weekly workers’-compensation payments. Peterson then applied for unemployment benefits. The New Hampshire Department of Employment Security (defendant) denied the application on the grounds that Peterson voluntarily left his employment. The appellate tribunal affirmed, and Peterson appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.