Arnold v. Leonard

273 S.W. 799 (1925)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Arnold v. Leonard

Texas Supreme Court
273 S.W. 799 (1925)

  • Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD

Facts

St. Clair and Adele Leonard (defendants) were married. St. Clair acquired debts to Gus Schultz during the marriage. Gus Arnold (plaintiff), as administrator of Shultz’s estate, obtained a judgment against St. Clair. Arnold then tried to levy execution on the rents from Adele’s separate property, arguing that the rents were community property. The trial court held in Adele’s favor because a Texas statute made rents of a wife’s separate property also separate property and another Texas statute prohibited a husband’s creditors from reaching the rents of a wife’s separate property. Arnold appealed, arguing that these laws were unconstitutional because the Texas constitution stated that all property belonging to a wife before marriage was separate property and only property acquired during marriage through gift, devise, or descent was separate property. The Texas Court of Civil Appeals certified the question of whether the laws were unconstitutional to the Texas Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Greenwood, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership