Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.
United States Supreme Court
495 U.S. 328 (1990)
- Written by John Reeves, JD
Facts
Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) (defendant) was in the gasoline business. ARCO’s gas stations sold gasoline directly to consumers, but ARCO also made sales through dealers authorized to sell the ARCO brand. USA Petroleum Co. (USA) (plaintiff) was one of ARCO’s competitors. USA’s gas stations had low overhead, thus enabling them to sell the gas at a discount. ARCO decided to compete more directly with USA by reducing its prices to those of USA. ARCO enabled its dealers to do this by reducing their costs, including eliminating credit card sales. ARCO also provided its distributors and dealers with various short-term discounts to enable its prices to match those of USA. This worked, resulting in ARCO’s sales and market share increasing. But it was undisputed by USA that the price that ARCO set for its sales matched that of USA and was not predatory. USA brought suit against ARCO in the district court under § 4 of the Clayton Act, alleging ARCO had violated § 1 of the Sherman Act by engaging in an unlawful vertical, maximum-price-fixing scheme. The district court granted summary judgment to ARCO. It found that even if ARCO had engaged in an unlawful vertical, maximum-price-fixing scheme, USA could not demonstrate it had suffered any injury absent the existence of predatory pricing. Consequently, USA lacked standing to bring the lawsuit. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed, concluding that any type of price-fixing necessarily disrupted the market and resulted in an injury that gave a competitor standing. ARCO petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.