Atlas Powder Co. v. E.I. du Pont De Nemours & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
750 F.2d 1569, 224 USPQ 409 (1984)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Atlas Power (plaintiff) owned a patent directed to a new blasting agent which was an improvement on a prior Atlas product. Soon after Atlas developed the optimal blasting agent and secured patent protection, Du Pont (defendant) developed an improved blasting agent, and Atlas sued for infringement. Du Pont argued that the Atlas patent was overly broad, specifically in that the disclosure was a listing of numerous elements that did not enable one of skill in the art to make the claimed invention. The district court disagreed with Du Pont and found that the Atlas claims were valid and enabled. Du Pont appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Baldwin, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.