Austin v. Austin
Supreme Court of Massachusetts
839 N.E.2d 837 (2005)
Craig Austin (defendant) and Donna Austin (plaintiff) were married for 12 years and had one child. Two days before the Austins’ wedding, Donna’s attorney drafted an antenuptial agreement for the Austins to sign. The agreement provided that both Craig and Donna waived alimony. During the marriage, Craig owned a restaurant and several other businesses, while Donna was a stay-at-home mother. Donna had only a high-school education. After being married for 12 years, at the age of 55, Donna filed for divorce. At trial, Donna was awarded the marital home, which was worth over $1,000,000, and $525,000 in cash. In addition, the trial judge ordered that Craig pay $500 per week in child support and $1,000 per week in alimony to maintain Donna’s upper-class lifestyle. Craig appealed the trial court’s alimony award.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Ireland, J.)
Dissent (Greaney, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.