Baatz v. Arrow Bar
Supreme Court of South Dakota
452 N.W.2d 138 (1990)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Edmond and LaVella Neuroth formed the Arrow Bar, Inc. The corporation purchased the Arrow Bar business for $155,000 with a $5,000 down payment, and the Neuroths executed a promissory note personally guaranteeing the remaining $150,000. The corporation obtained financing for $145,000 toward the purchase agreement, and the Neuroths again personally guaranteed the corporate debt. Peggy and Kenny Baatz (Baatz) (plaintiffs) were injured in an automobile accident when the motorcycle they were driving was struck by a vehicle driven by Roland McBride. McBride was uninsured, and Baatz brought suit against Arrow Bar and the Neuroths (defendants). The complaint alleges that the Arrow Bar negligently served alcohol to McBride when he was already intoxicated, prior to the accident. The trial court entered summary judgment dismissing the Neuroths as individual defendants, and Baatz now appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sabers, J.)
Dissent (Henderson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
