Back v. Back
Iowa Supreme Court
125 N.W. 1009 (1910)
William Back (Back) married Mrs. Dirke, who had a daughter, Reacke Back (Reacke) (plaintiff), by her late husband. Reacke was thus Back’s stepdaughter during the Back-Dirke marriage. Back and Dirke later divorced. Subsequently, Back married Reacke. Back died, and Reacke brought suit against the executor of Back’s estate (defendant), seeking a declaratory judgment that Reacke was entitled to a share of Back’s estate as his widow. The executor responded that Reacke’s marriage with Back was void because the marriage was incestuous under an Iowa statute that listed the daughter of a man’s wife as one of the people that a man could not marry. The statute stated that such a marriage was void. The trial court held that the marriage between Reacke and Back was void. Reacke appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (McClain, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.