Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Blumenthal v. Brewer

69 N.E. 3d 834 (2016)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

Blumenthal v. Brewer

Illinois Supreme Court

69 N.E. 3d 834 (2016)

Play video

Facts

Dr. Jane Blumenthal (plaintiff) and Judge Eileen Brewer (defendant) had a long-term, domestic relationship but were not married. The couple commingled their assets, including Brewer’s contribution to help Blumenthal purchase the ownership interest in her medical practice. Blumenthal’s subsequent income from the practice enabled Brewer to focus on raising the couple’s children at the expense of her earning potential. When the relationship ended, Blumenthal moved for partition of the couple’s home. Brewer counterclaimed for common law restitution, seeking an equal division of all assets. Brewer acknowledged that the relationship was identical to marriage in every way. The trial court dismissed the counterclaim based on Illinois’s prohibition of common law marriage. The appellate court reversed. Blumenthal appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Karmeier, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership