From our private database of 35,800+ case briefs...
Boulds v. Nielsen
Alaska Supreme Court
323 P.3d 58 (2014)
Raymond Boulds (defendant) and Elena Nielsen (plaintiff) lived together in a domestic partnership from 1993 until their separation in 2009. They were never married, but they occasionally wore wedding rings. They had three children together. Boulds worked full time supporting the family financially while Nielsen stayed at home to care for the children. Boulds included Nielsen as a dependent on his tax return. Through Boulds’s employer, Boulds accumulated an insurance death benefit, a retirement account, and a pension under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). After the couple’s separation, the superior court determined that the death benefit and retirement account were Boulds’s separate property and that the pension was partnership property. Boulds appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Winfree, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 620,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 620,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.