Breece v. Alliance Tractor-Trailer Training II
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
824 F. Supp. 576 (1993)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
Michael Breece (plaintiff) had a severe hearing impairment and applied to participate in a tractor-trailer driver program run by Alliance Tractor-Trailer Training II, Inc. (Alliance) (defendant). Breece’s impairment prevented Breece from hearing loud voices and often required a sign-language interpreter for his communication. A significant portion of the training program required students to drive on public roads while an instructor rode along as a passenger. Breece claimed that he could satisfy the program’s requirements through driving simulators, increased classroom instruction, an interpreter’s presence in the vehicle during drives, or a speaker to amplify his instructor’s voice. Alliance rejected Breece’s application to the program, claiming that it could not safely or reasonably accommodate Breece’s disability for the public-road training segments. Breece filed suit in federal district court, claiming that Alliance violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by rejecting his application.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hilton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.