Bridges v. Colvin

136 F. Supp. 3d 620 (2015)

From our private database of 47,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bridges v. Colvin

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
136 F. Supp. 3d 620 (2015)

  • Written by Jamie Milne, JD

Facts

Charles Bridges (plaintiff) worked as an administrative-law judge (ALJ) for the Social Security Administration (SSA). In 2004, Bridges was named the Hearing Office chief ALJ (HOCALJ) at the SSA’s Harrisburg, Pennsylvania office, a managerial role involving oversight of the office’s personnel. Among other things, Bridges was responsible for assigning and reassigning social-security-benefit appeals to his subordinate ALJs. In 2010, Bridges received an email from his supervisor, Regional Chief ALJ Jasper Bede (defendant), informing Bridges that he was being removed as the HOCALJ and returned to his former ALJ role. Bede said the decision resulted from a grievance filed by a subordinate ALJ claiming that Bridges improperly reassigned a pending appeal. However, Bridges believed that racial discrimination was the real motivation for his removal. Bridges sued Bede and other SSA officials (defendants), asserting multiple claims, including a claim that his removal without a hearing deprived him of a property interest without due process in violation of the Fifth Amendment. The SSA parties moved to dismiss Bridges’ claims. After having dismissed the other claims on various grounds, the district court considered the merits of the procedural-due-process claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Leeson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 964,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
  • AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,500 briefs - keyed to 1,006 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Administrative Law

Key Terms

  • Fifth Amendment Due Process ClauseProhibits the federal government from depriving an individual of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. The purpose of this clause is to prevent abuse of government authority in legal proceedings. Due process also requires that the federal government use fair methods or procedures when its actions would deprive an individual of life, liberty, or property.
  • At-Will EmploymentEmployment with no specified term that may be terminated at the will of either party by providing notice to the other party.
  • Administrative-Law Judge (ALJ)An official who presides over an administrative-type bench trial to resolve a dispute between a government agency and an individual.
  • Social Security AdministrationThe federal agency charged with administering Social Security benefits.

Understand your casebook readings in seconds

Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.

Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.

Case book preview
Start your free 7-day trial