Sykes v. Apfel

228 F.3d 259 (2000)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sykes v. Apfel

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
228 F.3d 259 (2000)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Clifton Sykes (plaintiff) suffered from several medical issues including a shoulder injury, obstructive pulmonary disease, left-eye blindness, and depression. Sykes applied for disability benefits from the Social Security Administration (SSA) (defendant). The administrative-law judge concluded that based on his exertional limitations, Sykes was able to perform light work. Exertional limitations are limitations that affect a person’s ability to meet physical demands of a job, such as sitting, standing, lifting, and carrying. All other limitations are nonexertional. The administrative-law judge denied Sykes’s application after applying the SSA’s medical-vocational guidelines (the grids) to Sykes’s exertional limitations and finding jobs that existed for Sykes in the national economy. The SSA appeals council denied Sykes’s request for a review, and the district court upheld the administrative-law judge’s denial of benefits. Sykes appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Becker, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership