Brown v. Brown

704 S.W.2d 528 (1986)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...

Brown v. Brown

Texas Court of Appeals

704 S.W.2d 528 (1986)

Facts

Horace Brown (plaintiff) and Dawn Marie Brown (defendant) were married. Horace was a 70-year-old widower with substantial financial savings. Dawn Marie was a 46-year-old divorcée. Horace and Dawn Marie met through a pen-pal club and were married very soon after. The spouses signed a postmarital agreement that bestowed financial benefits on Dawn Marie. Horace did not understand the agreement before he signed it. Soon after the marriage, Dawn Marie rapidly spent Horace’s money and berated and verbally abused Horace. Horace filed for divorce. Horace’s doctor testified that Horace developed a stomach disorder attributed to situational stress and, specifically, Dawn Marie’s treatment of Horace. Horace’s neighbor testified that Horace became nervous and depressed soon after the marriage. The trial court granted Horace the divorce and held that the postmarital agreement was void. Dawn Marie appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Countiss, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 631,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership