Carl J. Herzog Foundation, Inc. v. University of Bridgeport
Connecticut Supreme Court
699 A.2d 995 (1997)
The Carl J. Herzog Foundation (Foundation) (plaintiff) made a gift to the University of Bridgeport (University) (defendant) in 1986. The Foundation intended that the gift be used to provide scholarships for nursing students; however, the Foundation did not retain a reversionary interest in the gift. When the University closed its nursing school in 1991, the University added the gift funds to its general endowment. The Foundation then commenced an action to compel the University to either reestablish its nursing scholarships or transfer the gift funds to the Bridgeport Area Foundation, an entity that could administer the nursing scholarships. The case was ultimately appealed to the Connecticut Supreme Court to determine whether the Foundation had standing to enforce the conditions of its gift to the University.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.