From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Carter & Johnson
Securities and Exchange Commission
47 SEC 471 (1981)
William Carter and Charles Johnson (defendants) were experienced securities attorneys. In 1974, they were hired by National Telephone Company (National) to guide it through several attempts to keep the company solvent. In doing so, Carter and Johnson drafted several letters and proxy statements to investors indicating that National was entering a period in which it would be in a strong financial position. When National’s business failed, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff) brought suit against Carter and Johnson, alleging ethics violations for aiding National in its fraudulent representation of its finances, in violation of § 10(b) of the Exchange Act. The administrative law judge ruled against Carter and Johnson. They then appealed this decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 606,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 606,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.