Carter & Johnson
Securities and Exchange Commission
47 SEC 471 (1981)
- Written by Rocco Sainato, JD
Facts
William Carter and Charles Johnson (defendants) were experienced securities attorneys. In 1974, they were hired by National Telephone Company (National) to guide it through several attempts to keep the company solvent. In doing so, Carter and Johnson drafted several letters and proxy statements to investors indicating that National was entering a period in which it would be in a strong financial position. When National’s business failed, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff) brought suit against Carter and Johnson, alleging ethics violations for aiding National in its fraudulent representation of its finances, in violation of § 10(b) of the Exchange Act. The administrative law judge ruled against Carter and Johnson. They then appealed this decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.