Cermak v. Cermak
North Dakota Supreme Court
569 N.W.2d 280 (1997)
- Written by Brittany Frankel, JD
Facts
Loretta Cermak (defendant) and Duane Cermak (plaintiff) were married for 30 years. In 1995, Duane filed for divorce. The district court granted Duane’s petition and ordered that he pay Loretta $600 per month in permanent alimony. Duane requested that the court include a provision that the award would terminate upon Loretta’s cohabitation with another man, but the court declined to add that provision. Shortly after, Loretta began cohabitating with another man. Duane filed a request with the district court to terminate the alimony award due to Loretta’s cohabitation, because it resembled remarriage. The district court denied Duane’s request, because the original order stated that the award only terminated upon the death or remarriage of the recipient. Duane filed another appeal. In the event his request for termination was denied, Duane requested that the alimony award be reduced.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (VandeWalle, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.