Cincinnati Women’s Services, Inc. v. Taft
United States Appeals Court for the Sixth Circuit
468 F.3d 361 (2006)
Under Ohio law, minors could not obtain an abortion without showing parental consent or judicial approval pursuant to a “judicial-bypass” procedure. A minor’s judicial-bypass petition was to be granted where she demonstrated sufficient maturity and knowledge or where the abortion was in her best interests. In 1998, an amendment to the law was enacted in which minors were restricted from filing more than one judicial-bypass petition per pregnancy. The justification for the regulation was to prevent minors from judge-shopping. Cincinnati Women’s Services, Inc. (CWS) (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against the state of Ohio (defendant) to overturn the regulation. The trial court upheld the constitutionality of the law, and CWS appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
Concurrence (Rogers, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 168,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.