Club De Variedades Vegetales Protegidas v. Adolfo Juan Martínez Sanchís

Case C-176/18 (2019)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Club De Variedades Vegetales Protegidas v. Adolfo Juan Martínez Sanchís

European Union Court of Justice
Case C-176/18 (2019)

Facts

Between 1995 and 2006, Adolfo Juan Martínez Sanchís (defendant) purchased mandarin tree plants of the Nadorcott variety from a nursery. In October 2004, the European plant office granted Nadorcott Protection SARL a patent-like right to the variety. However, that decision was subject to an appeal, and the final decision granting the right was not issued until February 2006. Club de Variedades Vegetales Protegidas (CVVP) brought an action against Martínez Sanchís on behalf of the Nadorcott right holder, alleging that the purchases of the plant variety made by Martínez Sanchís between October 2004 and February 2006 constituted an infringement of the right. The Spanish provincial court dismissed the action as unfounded, finding that Martínez Sanchís had purchased the plants in good faith. CVVP appealed to the Spanish supreme court, which in turn stayed proceedings and referred the matter to the European Union Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling. The evidentiary record showed that fruits harvested from Nadorcott mandarin trees were not liable to be used for the purpose of generating more trees of the same variety.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership